Sep 29, 2016
By: Briar Dodge, Ottawa Community News
Everything changed for the Wassill family in May of 2013.
A confrontation that month led to 20-year-old Michael Wassill being stabbed with a box cutter, allegedly by the ex-boyfriend of a female friend of his. Michael was rushed to hospital. At first his family thought he’d recover, but on May 23, 2013, he died in his Ottawa Civic hospital bed.
Ever since then, his family has been living a nightmare. Not only is Michael dead, but the family’s wait for the trial for the then 20-year-old arrested in relation to his murder has dragged on and on. A court date has been set for 2017.
“It’s such a long period of time, and the grief never goes away,” said Betty-Ann Wassill, Michael’s mother. “Going through the trial is going to bring it all back.”
The Wassill family isn’t alone when it comes to a long wait for justice in the death of their son. While their wait is longer than most, the Canadian average sees most murder cases last more than a year. It can be a difficult emotional burden on friends and family of serious crime victims.
There are things Betty-Ann isn’t allowed to say about the case, and people she’s not allowed to talk to about it.
But as the reported facts go, Michael was at his father’s Fernleaf Cresent home in Orléans while his dad was away in Jordan on a work trip. A female friend of Michael’s had been staying there for a few weeks too.
On May 15, 2013, an ex-boyfriend of the girl’s, who she claims had been stalking her, showed up and what would end up being a deadly confrontation ensued, Michael’s uncle Paul Champ told media at the time.
Michael was stabbed with a box cutter, taken to hospital and his family remained hopeful he would survive. But on May 19, 2013, they found out he was brain dead. There was nothing anyone could do.
Police quickly arrested Carson Morin, 20 at the time, who Betty-Ann refers to as “the accused” throughout her interview with Metroland Media. She calls Michael’s death “the incident” or “the event.”
Morin was originally charged with attempted murder and possessing a weapon dangerous to public peace, but after Michael died, the charge was upgraded to second-degree murder. Following further investigation, police upped the charge again – to first degree murder.
Before Michael died, his family was already bracing themselves for a long legal ordeal.
“The night of the event the police were at the hospital. Even then, they were saying ‘just be prepared, the legal proceedings could take years.’” Betty-Ann said.
Morin’s lawyer Natasha J. Calvinho received a request for comment for this story and, citing the need to have permission from Morin, did not comment.
But even though Morin was arrested almost immediately in the aftermath of the incident, the case isn’t scheduled to go to trial until January 2017.
Michael’s family’s frustration partially comes from how that timeline, accelerated compared to some cases that take months to solve or before charges are laid, has resulted in such a long wait.
Betty-Ann, her two daughters, Michael’s father, his friends: they all want to move on and put this behind them, but there’s a dark shadow following them around.
They’re not alone.
On average, it took 451 days to complete a homicide case in 2013/14, according to the most recent Statistics Canada data. But it’s tough to use averages for such cases, because abnormalities — such as cases wrapped up extremely quickly, such as a murder-suicide — can skew the data.
So you end up with families like the Wassills, often waiting years for a case to make its way through the justice system.
WATING IN LIMBO
“You’re sort of in this limbo of waiting,” said Heidi Illingworth, executive director of the Canadian Resource Centre for Victims of Crime. “It just leaves people hanging, and they’re really just yearning for justice.”
It’s common for trials to take years, she said, especially when it comes to homicide cases.
Those accused of a crime in Canada are offered constitutional protection under the Charter of Rights, both for a fair and a speedy trial.
“At the moment, the concerns for suspects trump everything for victims,” said Irvin Waller, a University of Ottawa law professor and president of the International Organization for Victim Assistance. “The system isn’t designed around them, around victims.”
Delays in the court system have long been documented, and involve a complex web of issues in the justice system.
A 2016 Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs, in preparation for an interim report that was released in August called ‘Delaying Justice is Denying Justice: An Urgent Need to Address Lengthy Court Delays in Canada’, heard from numerous justice experts, judges, and lawyers, including Illingworth, who told the committee the Wassill family’s story.
The committee was told that among the reasons for delays in the court system are the mandatory minimums sentencing system that results in more court appearances, that judges are too lenient in allowing delays when asked for, and the courts are not using modern technology as much as they could which leads to more in-person court appearances than would be needed if technology was used more.
“We generally shun the use of technology as a method to enhance the effective use of court time,” Raymond Wyant, former chief judge to the provincial court of Manitoba, is quoted as saying in the committee’s transcripts.
But there are clear and established frameworks in other countries to help protect victims through the process. Wyant cited a video system used in France, that both speed up the court process, and in some cases allowed witnesses to be spared travel.
In the United States, the federal Crime Victims’ Rights Act was enacted in 2004. The act was named for five American murder victims whose families were denied some, or all of the eight rights covered in the act during the course of their cases. Included in the act is the right to proceed without unreasonable delays. “We are just so far behind other advanced countries, and we need to move on that,” the University of Ottawa’s Waller said.
As the Wassill family approached the end of 2013, they were faced with Morin’s bail application as he requested to be released for Christmas.
But after emotionally preparing to face him in court, the bail hearing didn’t happen, and his lawyer asked for a delay.
As the case has continued, Michael’s family and friends have continued to be frustrated by the delays, and the length between them. They attended a preliminary hearing in November 2014, Betty-Ann said, and hoped for court dates to be set for a seven-week trial. They were told the case would be heard at the earliest in May 2016.
Morin’s legal team asked to push the dates back further, and the family thought there would be a September 2016 trial.
In the end, the date was finally set for Jan. 23, 2017.
“We’re still not clear; how did it jump from September to January?” Betty-Ann said, pointing to scheduling issues among various lawyers’ schedules. “They knew all along this was coming down the pipeline.”
She believes Ottawa Police and the courts have offered her family every right they have to under the current victim’s rights situation, but she struggles with why they, the victim’s family, haven’t had the right to push for fewer delays, and a quicker trial in the Canadian justice system.
“We do concern ourselves with what the police do, what the Crown does and what the accused has done in the court, but we never actually take into consideration that this isn’t fair for the victims,” Senator Vern White, former Ottawa police chief, said in the standing committee hearings transcripts.
Senator Bob Runciman, who has previously served as Ontario’s provincial minister of public safety and security and as solicitor general and who now leads the committee, told Metroland Media that one of the most significant things he heard in the presentations to the committee was the need for better court management, and “laying down the law” when it comes to justifying lawyers’ requests for “adjournment after adjournment.”
“For me, that’s a sore thumb out there, that some judges are managing their courts much more effectively,” Runciman said.
Now, almost three-and-a-half years later, and still waiting for a trial, Michael’s family still haven’t had any closure. Betty-Ann feels empathy for Michael’s friends who will be called on as witnesses and will have to rehash the events and memories of a traumatic day back in 2013.
She worries others will struggle to balance wanting to be in court with having careers that may not afford them the time off, or the finances to take unpaid leave.
It’s not just stressful, but memories fade over time, and there are always concerns that witnesses will forget details when they’re called to the stand years after a crime has allegedly been committed.
Tom Stamataskis, president of the Canadian Police Association, told the senate committee it’s a struggle for police officers who are asked to testify as well. “Imagine yourselves and how effective you might be at remembering precise details from an incident that happened in your life two or three years ago,” he said, in committee transcripts. “Particularly under cross examination from tenacious defense counsel and after investigating numerous similar incidents over that same period of time.”
Michael’s parents, who are separated, are Foreign Affairs department employees who didn’t think they’d ever find themselves in this sort of position, and have had to become familiar with the legal system in a way they never expected.
“No one thinks they’re every going to be a victim,” Waller said. “Exactly the same issues arise all the time, and not just in murder cases … not only are they re-traumatized, but they are re-traumatized over many years.”
Betty-Ann said her family has tried to move past “the incident” and talk about their happy memories with Michael, who she said enjoyed staying home and playing board games and who quickly made friends in the different places he had lived.
The family tries to reflect on days such as Sept. 8, which is Michael’s birthday, on all the positives about his too-short life.
“We don’t talk about the incident,” she said. “It worries me a bit that the trial will put us back.”
It’s common for victims to feel re-victimized, devalued and that their lives are on hold until a case is finished, Sue O’Sullivan, the federal ombudsman for victims of crime told the senate committee back on March 24.
“Lengthy delays in criminal proceedings can impede some victims’ ability to move forward, and in some circumstances, victims’ access to justice can be completely compromised when charges are stayed as a result of unreasonable delay,” O’Sullivan said in the senate standing committee transcripts.
If a case is delayed too long – though an accused may have to waive their rights to speedy resolution if they cause a delay by, for example, choosing a lawyer that isn’t available for 18 months — charges could be stayed and the accused could walk free.
That happened this year, in the case of the Crown vs. Shane Rayshawn Vassell. In a Supreme Court decision, the judges found the three years it took for the three-day trial, which dealt with charges for possession of cocaine for the purpose of trafficking, had unreasonable delays, mostly caused by his co-accused and their counsel. The Supreme Court of Canada threw out the charges against him in June.
Waller said changes need to be made to give victims, not just the accused, the right to avoid unnecessary delays. He said he’d like to see a Victim Bill of Rights in Ontario and changes to the Criminal Code to protect victims.
He’d also like to see a change to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, a complex process.
He said the Bill of Rights for Crime Victims Ontario’s legislature adopted in 1996, and the federal Bill of Rights are not having much impact.
“There’s been talk about these sorts of things, and very little action,” Waller said. “The Ontario legislature adopted a thing called a Bill of Rights for Crime Victims that is basically unenforceable.
“There was political interest in doing something, so they made a nice statement instead of an enforceable statement. In the recent federal bill of rights that was adopted during the Harper years, it’s the exact same. They’re nice principles, and they’re unenforceable.”
The most enforceable thing, Waller said, would be an amendment to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. But he said Ontario would need to find a political “champion” to take that on.
He’s waiting to see what Ontario’s new attorney general, Ottawa Centre MPP Yasir Naqvi, does.
Naqvi’s spokesperson Jenna Mannone was asked if Naqvi would support a Charter of Rights and Freedoms change. She replied with with a list of funding announcements and programs the provincial government has for victims.
“That being said, we recognize that there is always more work to do,” she responded in an email. “Our government is always open to hearing ideas on ways we can further support victims of crime.”
Now, Betty-Ann and her family are preparing themselves emotionally for the impact of the trial coming up in January 2017. Not only has her family had to prepare, but so do Michael’s friends who will be called as witnesses.
Witnesses in Michael’s case have tried to move on with their lives, some studying out of province, and will need to come back to Ottawa in order to testify, Betty-Anne said.
“It’s absolutely an issue,” Illingworth agreed. “Everything’s pushed off again and again because of lawyers’ schedules or judges’ schedules are so busy they have to keep pushing dates. It’s a tactic we think the accused use as well — it’s sometimes in their interest to have things longer because people forget and witnesses disappear,” she said.
Betty-Ann said the system need to be improved – and she’s willing to speak out to make things better for the next family that finds itself in her shoes.
“I like to be an optimistic person, but I’ve been involved in the legal system as either a critic or a minister, so I find it hard to be overly optimistic,” said Runciman.
“All we can do is keep plugging away and banging the drum and hopefully people will start to listen.”
But constitutional changes, as some propose, are not something Runciman is enthusiastic about. “I can’t speculate at this stage of the game,” he said. “To open up the constitution to talk about something like even Senate reform, it would have to be a whole package once they re-open the constitution. But no one seems to have an appetite.”
The report from senators, who heard Michael’s story and the Wassills’ plight as a part of the process, did make four recommendations. They recommended the federal government:
Regardless of those recommendations, Betty-Ann and her family have spent the last three-and-a-half years waiting for a trial in a system the family feels doesn’t take into account victims.
“Justice delayed has been justice denied,” Betty-Ann said. “It’s such a long period of time, and the grief never goes away. Going through the trial is going to bring it all back.”
By Ariana Kelland, CBC News Posted: Sep 06, 2016 6:00 AM NT
Would you do it? Take the photo of your loved one and put it away to protect the rights of the person accused of killing them?
For families of victims of crime, holding on to a photo or memento of their loved one provides comfort and allows them to be represented in the court proceedings.
But recent cases in Newfoundland and Labrador courtrooms have seen grieving family members forced from the courtroom, and told to remove any items showing the victim in the case.
Hannah Thorne’s family was asked to remove framed photos of the teen during a court appearance in Harbour Grace last week. Alyssa Davis’s family was told to leave the court because they wore shirts with the girl’s photo on it.
“When Triffie was gone we had nothing else left,” said Sarina Wadman, whose older sister Triffie was shot by her ex-boyfriend and left bleeding to death on a St. John’s street in 2011.
“As her sister, I felt it important to keep her present.”
Wadman and her family brought laminated photos of the slain mother of one and buttons bearing her smiling face during each of Trevor Pardy’s court appearances.
“You will grasp those things like you’ve never grasped them before.”
It was never an issue — even when the case went before a jury.
“The victims and the victims’ families need to be more important,” Wadman said, adding for years she felt silenced by the court system in fear of jeopardizing the case against her sister’s killer.
So, what’s the harm in families holding photos in court?
If you ask a defence lawyer, they’ll tell you very bluntly: it could infringe on the rights of the accused and prejudice the case.
Rod Churchill, whose son Matthew was struck and killed at the age of 15, questions the validity of that concern, given that a judge’s role is to be impartial.
“A judge is on the bench for a reason. He’s proven himself to be an impartial person when it comes to the whole legal process, and I can’t see how a picture will influence his decision,” Churchill said.
“Now, I could understand it more if it was a jury. I can see it having possible influence.”
Asked if the rights of victim’s families and the accused appear balanced, Terri-Lee Coates is quick to say no.
Her brother, Nick Coates, was killed in an impaired driving collision on Kenmount Road in August 2014.
“I don’t think it was fair that the man that killed my brother was not in court. He didn’t have to come see the pain that was on our faces,” Coates said.
“I’ve watched the video of my brother being killed hundreds of times. And he got to sit home with his family.”
Like the Wadmans, the Coates family were allowed to clutch photos of the 27-year-old during Ronald Thistle’s court proceedings. Thistle eventually pleaded guilty and served nine months in jail.
Those photos gave comfort and control — albeit small — during a time of turmoil, Coates said.
She was angry when she heard Alyssa Davis’s family were removed from provincial court because they were wearing T-shirts in support of the deceased teen.
“I don’t think [Sherree Davis] should be told to leave, or take her shirt off or turn it inside out,” Coates said. “Let the mother grieve.”
Heidi Illingworth, executive director of the Canadian Resource Centre for Victims of Crime, said she’s disappointed that judges still ask families to keep tokens of their loved ones out of the courtroom.
“It shows that accused persons rights do trump those of victims,” Illingworth said, adding the accused has constitutionally-based rights and those of victims are only legislatively-based.
“It is unfair and insensitive for victims and their families who are present to represent their loved ones who’ve been taken.”